References [1] Albert, R., Jeong, H. and Barabási, A.-L. (1999). Diameter of the World-Wide Web. Nature 401 (6749), 130-131. [2] Barabási, A.-L. and Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286 (5439), 509-512. [3] Bass, F.M. (1969). A new product growth for model consumer durables. Manag. Sci. 15 (5), 215-227. [4] Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. Am. J. of Sociol. 92, 1170-1182. [5] Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure on Competition. Harvard Univ. Press, MA. [6] Campbell-Kelly, M. (2009). Historical reflections: The rise, fall, and resurrection of software as a service. Comm. of the ACM 52 (5), 28-30. [7] Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, MA. [8] Everard, A. and Henry, R. (2002). A social network analysis of interlocked directorates in electronic commerce firms. Electr. Commerce Res. and App. 1 (2), 225-234. [9] Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1, 215-239. [10] Gloor, P.A., Krauss, J., Nann, S., Fischbach, K. and Schoder, D. (2009). Web science 2.0: Identifying trends through semantic social network analysis. In Proc. of the 12th CSE, Vancouver, Canada. [11] Granovetter, M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. Am. J. of Sociol. 78 (6), 1360-1380. [12] Grewal, R., Lilien, G.L. and Mallapragada, G. (2006). Location, location, location: How network embeddedness affects project success in open source systems. Manag. Sci. 52 (7), 1043-1056. [13] Girvan, M. and Newman, M.E.J. (2002). Community structures in social and biological networks. Proc. of the Nat. Acad. of Sci. of the USA 99 (12), 7821-7826. [14] Haines, M.N. and Rothenberger, M.A. (2010). How a service-oriented architecture may change the software development process. Comm. of the ACM 53 (8), 135-140. [15] Hansen, M.T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Q. 44 (1), 82-111. [16] Hargadon, A.B. (2002). Brokering knowledge: Linking, learning and innovation. Res. in Organiz. Behav. 24, 41-85. [17] Hwang, J., Altmann, J. and Kim, K. (2009). The structural evolution of the Web2.0 service ntwork. Onl. Inform. Rev. 33 (6), 1040-1067. [18] Jin, J.H., Park, S.C. and Pyon, C.U. (2011). Finding research trend of convergence technology based on Korean R&D network. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (12): 15159-15171. [19] Jovanovic, B. and MacDonald, G.M. (1994). The life cycle of a competitive industry. J. Polit. Econ. 102 (2), 322-347. [20] Kim, K., Hwang, J. and Altmann, J. (2011). Does Web2.0 foster innovation? An analysis of the openness of the Web2.0 service network. In Proc. of the 44th HICSS, Kauai, HI. [21] Lemmens, C.E.A.V. (2004). Innovation in Technology Alliance Networks. Edward Elgar, MA. [22] Newman, M.E.J. (2001). Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Phys. Rev. E 64 (2), 025102. [23] Ogrinz, M. (2009). Mashup Patterns: Designs and Examples for the Modern Enterprise. Addison-Wesley. [24] O'Reilly (2007), What is Web2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Commun. and Strat. 65, 17-37. [25] Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F. and Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc. Netw. 32 (3), 245-251. [26] Papazoglou, M.P. and Georgakopoulos, D. (2003). Introduction: Service-Oriented Computing. Comm. of the ACM 46 (10), 24-28. [27] Scott, J. (1991). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. Sage Publication, UK. [28] Sasidharan, S., Santhanam, R., Brass, D.J. and Sambamurthy, V. (2011). The effects of social network structure on enterprise systems success: A longitudinal multilevel analysis. Infor. Syst. Res. 23 (3-1), 658-678. [29] Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. of Manag. J. 44 (5), 996-1004. [30] Valverde, S. and Solé, R.V. Self-organization versus hierarchy in open source social networks. Phys. Rev. E 76 (4), 046118.