References [1] Puthal D, Sahoo BP, Mishra S, Swain S. Cloud computing features, issues, and challenges: a big picture. InComputational Intelligence and Networks (CINE), 2015 International Conference on 2015, 116-123. [2] Gebregiorgis SA, Altmann J. IT service platforms: Their value creation model and the impact of their level of openness on their adoption. Procedia Computer Science. 2015, 68:173-87. [3] Haile N, Altmann J. Value creation in software service platforms. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2016, (29)55:495-509. [4] Altmann J, Hovestadt M, Kao O. Business support service platform for providers in open cloud computing markets. INC2011, IEEE 7th Intl Conf on Networked Computing. 2011. [5] Caracas A, Altmann J. A pricing information service for grid computing. 5th Intl Workshop on Middleware for Grid Computing, 2007. [6] Rohitratana J, Altmann J. Impact of pricing schemes on a market for software-as-a-service and perpetual software. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2012, 28(8):1328-1339. [7] Boillat T, Legner C. From on-premise software to cloud services: the impact of cloud computing on enterprise software vendors' business models. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research. 2013, 8(3):39-58. [8] Sanaei Z, Abolfazli S, Gani A, Buyya R. Heterogeneity in mobile cloud computing: taxonomy and open challenges. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE. 2014, 16(1):369-92. [9] Satzger B, Hummer W, Inzinger C, Leitner P, Dustdar S. Winds of change: From vendor lock-in to the meta cloud. Internet Computing, IEEE. 2013, 1(1):69-73. [10] Haile N, Altmann J. Risk-benefit-mediated impact of determinants on the adoption of cloud federation. In: 19th Pacific Asia Conf on Information Systems, 2015. [11] Haile N, Altmann J. Estimating the value obtained from using a software service platform. In: Altmann J, Vanmechelen K, Rana OF, GECON, Springer LNCS 8193, 2013, 244-255. [12] Benlian, A, Hess, T. The risks of sourcing software as a service - an empirical analysis of adopters and non-adopters. European Conference on Information Systems. 2010. [13] Lewis GA. Role of standards in cloud-computing interoperability. InSystem Sciences (HICSS), 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on 2013, 1652-1661. [14] Moreno-Vozmediano R, Montero RS, Llorente IM. Key challenges in cloud computing: Enabling the future internet of services. Internet Computing, IEEE. 2013, 17(4):18-25. [15] Infosecurity. IEEE: Interoperability, data portability trouble cloud customers as much as security. 2011. http://www.infosecurity-us.com/view/19225/ieee-interoperability-data-portability-trouble-cloud-customers-as-much-as-security/ [Accessed 8/2011]. [16] Gens F. IDC IT cloud service survey: top benefits and challenges. 2009. http://blogs.idc.com/ie/?p=730 [Accessed on 10/2011]. [17] Rust RT., Zahorik AJ, Keiningham TL. Return on quality (ROQ): Making service quality financially accountable. Journal of Marketing. 1995, 18:58-70. [18] Rezaei R, Chiew TK, Lee SP, Aliee ZS. A semantic interoperability framework for software as a service systems in cloud computing environments. Expert Systems with Applications. 2014, 41(13):5751-70. [19] Microsoft. The economics of the cloud for the EU public sector. White paper, 2010. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ukgovernment/archive/2010/11/18/cloud-computing-economics-of-the-cloud-for-public-sector-free-white-paper.aspx [Accessed 31/01/2012]. [20] Gasser U, Palfrey JG. Breaking down digital barriers: When and how ICT interoperability drives innovation. Berkman Center Research Publication. 2007, (2007-8). [21] Pitt LF, Watson RT, Kavan, CB. Service quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS quarterly, 1995, 173-187. [22] Ranabahu A, Maximilien EM, Sheth A, Thirunarayan K. Application portability in cloud computing: an abstraction-driven perspective. IEEE Trans Services Computing. 2015, 8(6):945-57. [23] Abolfazli SA, Sanaei Z, Sanaei M, Shojafar M, Gani A. Mobile cloud computing: the-state-of-the-art, challenges, and future research. Encyclopedia of Cloud Computing, Wiley, 2015. [24] Silva GC, Rose LM, Calinescu R. Towards a model-driven solution to the vendor lock-in problem in cloud computing. In: Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), IEEE 5th International Conference. 2013, 1:711-716. [25] Matutes C, Regibeau P. Mix and match: product compatibility without network externalities. RAND J of Economics. 1988, 19:221-234. [26] Schiff A. Open and closed systems of two-sided networks. Information Economics and Policy. 2003, 15:425-442. [27] Arora A, Bokhari F. Open versus closed firms and the dynamics of industry evolution. J Industrial Economics. 2007, 55:499-527. [28] Cloud Computing Use Case Discussion Group. Cloud computing use cases white paper, version 4.0. 2010. http://opencloudmanifesto.org/Cloud_Computing_Use_Cases_Whitepaper-4_0.pdf. [Accessed on 5/2016]. [29] Kim K, Altmann J, Hwang J. An analysis of the openness of the Web2.0 service network using two sets of indices for measuring the impact of service ownership. HICSS44. 2011. [30] Kim K, Altmann J, Hwang J. Measuring and analyzing the openness of the Web2.0 service network for improving the innovation capacity of the Web2.0 system through collective intelligence. In: Bastiaens TJ, Baumöl U, Krämer BJ. On Collective Intelligence. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, Springer 2010. 76:93-105. [31] Kim K, Kang S, Altmann J. Goliath vs. a federation of Davids: a two-sided market analysis of competition between clouds. In: Altmann J, Vanmechelen K, Rana OF, GECON, Springer LNCS 8914. 2014, 45-56. [32] Breskovic I, Altmann J, Brandic I. Creating standardized products for electronic markets. Future Generation Computer Systems, Elsevier, 2013, 29(4):1000-1011. [33] Windows Azure. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure [Accessed on 5/2016]. [34] Google App Engine. http://code.google.com/appengine/ [Accessed on 5/2016]. [35] Amazon elastic compute cloud. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2. [Accessed on 5/2016]. [36] Datapipe. https://www.datapipe.com/ [Accessed on 5/2016]. [37] Amazon. Amazon elastic load balancing. 2016. https://aws.amazon.com/elasticloadbalancing/. [Accessed 0n 5/2016]. [38] Machado GS, Hausheer D, Stiller B. Considerations on the interoperability of and between cloud computing standards. In: Open Grid Forum (OGF27), G2C-Net Workshop: From Grid to Cloud Networks, 2009. [39] Ortiz JrS. The problem with cloud computing standardization. Computer. 2011, 1(7):13-6. [40] Bozman J. Cloud computing: the need for portability and interoperability. IDC Analyze the Future, Sponsored by Red Hat, Inc. 2010. [41] Ranjan R, Benatallah B, Dustdar S, Papazoglou MP. Cloud resource orchestration programming: overview, issues, and directions. Internet Computing. 2015, 19(5):46-56. [42] Peppard J, Rylander A. From value chain to value network: insights for mobile operators. European Management J. 2006, 24:128-141. [43] Altmann J, Ion M, Bany Mohammed A. Taxonomy of grid business models. In: Veit D, Altmann J, GECON, Springer LNCS 4685. 2007, 29-43. [44] Stanoevska-Slabeva K, Figà Talamanca C, Thanos GA, Zsigri C. Development of a generic value chain for the grid industry. In: Veit D, Altmann J, GECON, LNCS 4685. 2007, 44-57. [45] Lee H, Leem C. A study on value chain in a ubiquitous computing environment. In: Gervasi O, Gavrilova ML, Kumar V, Laganá A, Lee HP, Mun Y, Taniar D, Tan CJK, ICCSA 2005. Springer LNCS 3483. 2005, 113-121. [46] Bany Mohammed A, Altmann J, Hwang J. Cloud computing value chains: understanding businesses and value creation in the cloud. In: Neumann, D., Baker, M., Altmann, J., Rana, O.F., Economic Models and Algorithms for Distributed Systems. 2010, 187-208. [47] Böhm M, Koleva G, Leimeister S, Riedl C. Towards a generic value network for cloud computing. In: Altmann J, Rana OF, GECON, Springer LNCS 6296. 2010, 129-140. [48] Parameswaran AV, Chaddha A. Cloud interoperability and standardization. SETLab briefing. 2009, 1-7. [49] Cunha D, Neves P, Sousa P. Interoperability and portability of cloud service enablers in a PaaS environment. 2012. [50] Petcu D, Vasilakos AV. Portability in clouds: approaches and research opportunities. Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience. 2014, 15(3):251-70. [51] Sterman J. Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin-McGraw-Hill. 2000. [52] Haile N, Altmann J. Structural analysis of value creation in software service platforms. Electronic Markets. 2016, 26(2):129-142. [53] Cloud Services Measurement Initiative Consortium (CSMIC). The service measurement index, Version 2.1, 2014, http://csmic.org/downloads/SMI_Overview_TwoPointOne.pdf [Accessed on 5/2016]. [54] Gompertz, B. On the Nature of the Function Expressive of the Law of Human Mortality, and on a New Mode of Determining the Value of Life Contingencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 1825(115):513-583. [55] Lee SYT, Kim, HW, Gupta S. Measuring open source software success. Omega. 2009, 37(2):426-438. [56] Grönroos C. A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of marketing. 1984, 18(4):36-44. [57] TheGuardian. How much are you worth to Facebook? 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jan/28/how-much-are-you-worth-to-facebook [Accessed on 5/2016]. [58] Parry E, Schröder H, Flynn M, Anderson D. Age and Diversity in Europe. In: International Human Resource Management. Routledge, 219-236. [59] Truong A. What tech companies spent on R&D relative to revenue. 2016. https://www.theatlas.com/charts/N1Gs8E4v [Accessed on 1/2017].