References


[1] US Department of Commerce, 1999. Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

[2] Brynjolfsson, E., Kahin, B., 2000. Understanding the Digital Economy: Data, Tools, and Research. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

[3] Lyotard, J.-F., 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Fu, F., Liu, L., Wang, L., 2008. Empirical analysis of online social networks in the age of Web2.0. Physica A, vol. 387, no. 2-3, pp. 675-684.

[4] Drucker, P., 1969. The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society. New York: Harper and Row.

[5] Bell, D., 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books Inc.

[6] Solow, R.M., 1987. We’d better watch out. New York Times Book Review July 12, 36.

[7] Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L.M., 1998. Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM 41, 49-55.

[8] Romer, P.M., 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. The Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002-37.

[9] Ray, G., Lakshmanan, T.R., Anderson, W.P., 2002. Increasing returns to scale in affluent knowledge-rich economies. Growth and Change 32, 491-510.

[10] Ellison, G., Fudenberg, D., 2000. The neo-luddite’s lament: excessive upgrades in the software industry. The RAND Journal of Economics 31, 253-72.

[11] Gordon, R.J., 1999. Has the ‘New Economy’ rendered the productivity slowdown obsolete? Northwestern University Working Paper.

[12] Stiroh, K.J., 2002. Are ICT spillovers driving the new economy? Review of Income and Wealth 48, 33-57.

[13] Arthur, B., 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

[14] Shy, O., 2001. The Economics of Network Industry. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[15] Harrington, L., Reed, G., 1996. Electronic commerce finally comes of age. The McKinsey Quarterly 2, 68-75.

[16] Balakrishnan, R., Fitzmaurice, G., Kurtenbach, G., Buxton, W., 1999. Digital tape drawing. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’99), 161-69.

[17] Mueller, M.L., Park, Y., Lee, J., Kim, T.Y., 2006. Digital identity: how users value the attributes of online identifiers. Information Economics and Policy 1818, 405-22.

[18] Yoo, B., 2008. The impact of digital convergence on firm’s strategies: integrated versus separated firms. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) Proceedings.

[19] US Department of Commerce, 1998. A Basic Guide to Exporting. Piscataway, NJ: Unz & Co.

[20] Kraemer, K.L., Dedrick, J., Yamashiro, S., 2000. Refining and extending the business model with information technology: Dell computer corporation. The Information Society 16, 5-21.

[21] Kahn, J.A., McConnell, M.M., Perez-Quiros G., 2001. Inventories and the information revolution: implications for output volatility. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Working Paper.

[22] Tapscott, D., 1997. Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.

[23] Tapscott, D., 2009. Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation Is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw-Hill.

[24] Alch, M., 2000. Get ready for the net generation. Training & Development 54, 32-34.

[25] Leung, L., 2004. Net-generation attributes and seductive properties of the internet as predictors of online activities and internet addiction. Cyber Psychology & Behavior 77, 333-48.

[26] Kim, T.Y., Heshmati, A., Park, J., 2010. Decelerating agricultural society: theoretical and historical perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77, 479-99.

[27] Kim, T.Y., Kim, S, Lee, J., 2010. The gene of an accelerating industrial society: expansive reproduction. TEMEP Discussion Paper No. 2010:50.

[28] Solow, R.M., 1957. Technical change and production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics 3939, 312-20.

[29] The White House, 2001. Economic Report of the President. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

[30] Van Ark, B., Inklaar, R., McGuckin, R.H., 2002. ‘Changing Gear’ Productivity, ICT, and Services Industries: Europe and the United States. The Industrial Dynamics of the New Digital Economy. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.

[31] World Development Indicators Database, 2008. The World Bank. (http://data.worldbank.org).

[32] Stiroh, K.J., 1998. Computers, productivity, and input substitution. Economic Inquiry 36, 175-91.

[33] Jorgenson, D.W., Stiroh, K.J., 1999. Information technology and growth. The American Economic Review 8989, 109-15.

[34] Jorgenson, D.W., Ho, M.S., Stiroh, K.J., 2003. Lessons from US growth resurgence. Journal of Policy Modeling 25, 453-70.

[35] The Bureau of Labor Statistics, Database, February 2010 Tables and Calculators by Subject. (http://www.bls.gov).

[36] Oliner, S.D., Sichel, D.E., 2003. Information technology and productivity: where are we now and where are we going? Journal of Policy Modeling 25, 477-503.

[37] The Bureau of Economic Analysis, February 2010. Industry Economic Account. (http://www.bea.gov).

[38] The White House, 2002. Economic Report of the President. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

[39] Martinez, D., Rodriquez, J., Torres, J.L., 2010. ICT-specific technological change and productivity growth in the US: 1980–2004. Information Economics and Policy 2222, 121-29.

[40] International Monetary Fund, 2009. Ireland: Staff Report for the 2009 Article IV Consultation. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

[41] EU KLEMS, 2009. EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts. (http://www.euklems.net).

[42] Groningen Growth and Development Centre, 2005. 60-Industry Database. (http://www.ggdc.net).

[43] Carl J., Routti, J., Ylä-Anttila, P., 2006. Finland as a Knowledge Economy: Elements of Success and Lessons Learned. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

[44] Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2002. Country statistical profile.(http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/Default.aspx?usercontext=sourceoecd).

[45] Jalava, J., Pohjola, M., 2008. The roles of electricity and ICT in economic growth: case Finland. Explorations in Economic History 4545, 270-87.

[46] Nordhaus, W.D., 2002. Productivity growth and the New Economy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2002, 2, 211-44.

[47] Jalava, J., Pohjola, M., 2007. ICT as a source of output and productivity growth in Finland. Telecommunications Policy 3131, 463-72.

[48] Pohjola, M., 2008. Growth and Productivity in Real-Time World. Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics.

[49] Hilbert, M.R., 2001. From Industrial Economics to Digital Economics: An Introduction to the Transition. Santiago: United Nations Publication.

[50] Schreyer, P., 2000. The contribution of information and communication technology to output growth: a study of the G7 countries. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers.

[51] David, P.A., 1990. The dynamo and the computer: an historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. AEA Papers and Proceedings 80, 355-61.

[52] Crafts, N., 2002. The Solow productivity paradox in historical perspective. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3142.

[53] Kurzweil, R., 2005. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. London: Penguin Books Ltd.

[54] David, P.A., Olsen, T.E., 1986. Equilibrium dynamics of diffusion when incremental technological innovations are foreseen. Ricerche Economiche 40, 738-70.

[55] Gordon, R.J., 2002. Technology and Economic Performance in the American Economy. CEPR Discussion Papers 3213, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

[56] Gordon, R.J., 2003. Hi-tech Innovation and Productivity Growth: Does Supply Create Its Own Demand? NBER Working Papers 9437, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.